The first problem is this:
Suppose that ( a 1 , b 1 ) , ⋯ , ( a n , b n ) (a_1,b_1),\cdots,(a_n,b_n) ( a 1 , b 1 ) , ⋯ , ( a n , b n ) are distinct pairs from positive integers. Prove that:
( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a n ) ( b 1 + ⋯ + b n ) > 2 9 n 3 (a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n)(b_1+\cdots+b_n)>\frac29 n^3 ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a n ) ( b 1 + ⋯ + b n ) > 9 2 n 3
And actually, the coefficient 2 / 9 2/9 2/9 is the best.
At the first time I see this problem, the weird coefficient really confuses me. Why is 2 / 9 2/9 2/9 not others. I really need a convincing explanation.
So we can try to dive deeper here.
While natively, we want to find the minimum of the left hand side. So we’ll start with this:
( 1 , 1 ) , ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 1 ) , ⋯ (1,1),(1,2),(2,1),\cdots ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 1 ) , ⋯
This is like the integral points under x + y = k x+y=k x + y = k for some k, and actually this is a triangle.
Is it possible to go in this part? Let’s try. While, We suppose that the first n n n terms are points under x + y ≤ k x+y\le k x + y ≤ k , then n n n is about ( k 2 2 ) (\frac{k^2}{2}) ( 2 k 2 ) .
So we can say that
( a 1 + ⋯ a n ) = ∫ T x d x d y = ∫ 0 k ∫ 0 k − y x d x d y = 1 2 ∫ 0 k ( k − y ) 2 d y = 1 6 k 3 (a_1+\cdots a_n)=\int_T x dxdy=\int_0^{k}\int_0^{k-y}xdxdy=\frac12\int_0^k(k-y)^2dy=\frac16k^3 ( a 1 + ⋯ a n ) = ∫ T x d x d y = ∫ 0 k ∫ 0 k − y x d x d y = 2 1 ∫ 0 k ( k − y ) 2 d y = 6 1 k 3
Similarly,
b 1 + ⋯ + b n = 1 6 k 3 b_1+\cdots +b_n=\frac 16 k^3 b 1 + ⋯ + b n = 6 1 k 3
So the previous problem is like this:
( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a n ) ( b 1 + ⋯ + b n ) = 1 36 k 6 = 2 9 n 3 (a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n)(b_1+\cdots+b_n)=\frac1{36}k^6=\frac29n^3 ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a n ) ( b 1 + ⋯ + b n ) = 36 1 k 6 = 9 2 n 3
But actually, it is approximated equal, and here comes the coefficient 2 9 \frac 29 9 2
Here is another problem, which will be more surprising.
(2026 CGMO 1) We call n n n is a good number if all of its prime factors is no more than n \sqrt n n . Prove that: there exists 2026 pairwise coprime good numbers, such that each of their differences are also good numbers
This problem itself is not a hard one. But we can think something more interesting, that what is the density of such good numbers?
We can do some basic trials: 4, 8, 9, 12, 16, …
It won’t be short.
We try to compute this normally. Actually, “bad numbers” are somehow easier to deal. s = p m s=pm s = p m , and m ≤ p m\le p m ≤ p while p is a prime number.
We denote S as the total bad numbers in 1 , ⋯ , N 1,\cdots,N 1 , ⋯ , N , then each number can be written as
S ≤ ∑ p ≤ N ∑ m ≤ p , m ≤ N p 1 = ∑ p ≤ N p + ∑ p > N ⌊ N p ⌋ ≤ N ⋅ π ( N ) + N ⋅ ( π ( N ) − π ( N ) ) S\le\sum_{p\le N}\sum_{m\le p,m\le\frac Np} 1 = \sum_{p\le \sqrt N}p+\sum_{p>\sqrt N} \lfloor\frac Np\rfloor \le\sqrt N\cdot \pi(\sqrt N) + N \cdot (\pi (N)-\pi (\sqrt N)) S ≤ p ≤ N ∑ m ≤ p , m ≤ p N ∑ 1 = p ≤ N ∑ p + p > N ∑ ⌊ p N ⌋ ≤ N ⋅ π ( N ) + N ⋅ ( π ( N ) − π ( N ))
While here are some wide-known results:
∑ p ≤ N 1 p ≈ log log N \sum_{p\le N} \frac 1p \approx \log\log N ∑ p ≤ N p 1 ≈ log log N .
π ( x ) ≈ x log x \pi (x) \approx x \log x π ( x ) ≈ x log x .
So here,
S N ≤ log N + log log N − log log N \frac S{N}\le \log \sqrt N + \log\log N - \log \log \sqrt N N S ≤ log N + log log N − log log N
which can be easily derived to be 1 − log 2 1 - \log 2 1 − log 2 .
Here is another idea, which can be generalized to count bad numbers.
n = p 1 α 1 p 2 α 2 ⋯ p k α k p k + 1 n = p_1^{\alpha _1}p_2^{\alpha _2}\cdots p_{k}^{\alpha _{k}} p_ {k+1} n = p 1 α 1 p 2 α 2 ⋯ p k α k p k + 1 and p k + 1 > p 1 α 1 p 2 α 2 ⋯ p k α k p_{k+1} > p_1^{\alpha _1}p_2^{\alpha _2}\cdots p_{k}^{\alpha _{k}} p k + 1 > p 1 α 1 p 2 α 2 ⋯ p k α k . So we know that
log p k + 1 > α 1 log p 1 + α 2 log p 2 + ⋯ + α k log p k \log p_{k+1} > \alpha_1\log p_1+\alpha_2\log p_2+\cdots+\alpha_{k}\log p_{k} log p k + 1 > α 1 log p 1 + α 2 log p 2 + ⋯ + α k log p k
We can see this by set coordinates in N p − 1 \mathbb{N}^{p-1} N p − 1 so that, we want find integral points ( α 1 , α 2 , ⋯ , α k ) (\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\cdots,\alpha_{k}) ( α 1 , α 2 , ⋯ , α k ) , as we stated.
So similarly, we use the theory we stated before, expand to this.
S ( ( α 1 , α 2 , ⋯ , α k ) ) ≤ V k = ( log p k + 1 ) k ( k ! ) ( ∏ j = 1 k log p j ) S((\alpha_1,\alpha_2,\cdots,\alpha_{k})) \le V_{k} = \frac{(\log p_{k+1})^k}{(k!)(\prod_{j=1}^k \log p_j)} S (( α 1 , α 2 , ⋯ , α k )) ≤ V k = ( k !) ( ∏ j = 1 k log p j ) ( log p k + 1 ) k
We can generalize this form by this:
Ψ ( x , y ) : \Psi (x,y): Ψ ( x , y ) : The biggest prime factor of x x x is ≤ y \le y ≤ y . So in this problem, this is exactly : Ψ ( x , x ) \Psi(x,\sqrt x) Ψ ( x , x ) (Smooth Number )