Table of Contents
Open Table of Contents
Problem Sets
Chapter 2
[Example 2.34]
Is there a polynomial in two variables, with integer coefficients and having the following properties:
a) The equation has no integral solutions.
b) For each positive integer n there are integers x, y such that ?
Solution:
Actually “a” is easy to achieve, what we emphasize on is the “integral”. The answer construct .
And easy to prove that for any number, decides the odd part, and decides the even part.
Something Deeper:
To be finished
This part shows that somewhere, multi variable have a strong and more freedom than expected properties in divisibility.
[Example 2.35]
( Turkey TST 2016) Find all functions such that for all we have and .
My Experiences
My mistake start from , and automatically think that , but however, k is somewhere not stable, so this is a useless trial.
But how to make my idea more grown?
And I also fell into the second hole as I consider which is confusing.
Solution
We know that if , then . So we suppose below.
If , then we start by , then we get that . Which indicates that f is the form of a power.
After 2, we need to expand to the whole . We deduce that m,r are odd, then , as we vary r, we get . Note that here, we use the variable r is really important. We expect the result as which we want it have infinitely factors.
We need to establish that k is exactly odd by: . If k is even, we have which indicates contradiction. So don’t lose any occasions here.
Generalizations:
- Theorem (INMO 2017): Find all functions such that and for all distinct .
- Weakening the multiplication to addition: change to (Cauchy’s additive equation on )
-
(IMO 1988) Let a, b be positive integers such that ab+ 1 divides
. Prove that is a perfect square.[Vieta Jump] Very Typical nothing to say.
-
(IMO 2007) Let a,b be positive integers such that . Prove that a = b.
Where I got stucked: It is not easy to give ab automatically quadratic function, because normally, a will reserved as 3 or 4 times, and it’s hard. b is also unusable, because only 1 power.
Solution
While the solution use by some basic changing of the division line. As it is hard to directly use one, we need to use consequence: . Then we get . Then finished.
Remark 2.38
Here are a few very similar problems, all of which can be solved by the same argument:
-
Positive integers a, b satisfy . Prove that .
I am curious about one thing. In this form, we can easily get that . Then if we suppose that (While definitely ), we will have , And then contradiction, where the 3 comes? In other word, I am not fully understand this form.
Find the contradiction part by computing a symmetric quantity . Then we know that Contradiction!
-
Let a,b be positive integers such that is divisible by . Prove
that = 5.The main logic is from that when , there will be contradiction, and if , and , we can find , which is steady.
and when , possible to find that , then k is all 5.
-
(AMM 11374) Let a, b, c, d be positive integers such that .
Prove that d = 4.Local value of the quadratic function. Generalize it by , we construct that , by the minimalize, we know that . Use the condition that , we have
Then we try that if and try to find the contradictions.
-
(USA TST 2002) Find all ordered pairs of positive integers (m, n) such
that mn — 1 divides .Every single solution to this equation can be reached by starting at the base cases () and “jumping” upwards using the Vieta recurrence relation:
The sequence defined by and : The sequence defined by and :
-
(USA TST 2009) Find all pairs of positive integers (m, n) such that
mn — 1 divides .I find that after executing, I get , which shows that m and n are symmetric.
-
If m=n I tried and found that , by the order and basic trial, I found that is formed.
-
Now suppose that n>m, we have that if , we have . So
Afterwards, we suppose n is min, so
Also
Also, however,
Definitely comtradiction!
If m=2, Contradiction
If m=1, Contradiction!
-
Ohhhh I am wrong!!!
Your approach is quite good in spirit: you found the right hidden symmetry and you are trying to use Vieta jumping. But there is one important algebra slip, and it changes the answer.
The symmetric divisor should be
[
mn-1\mid m^2+n^2-2m-2n+3,
]not with (-2). That (+3) is crucial. For example, ((2,5)) is a solution:
[
mn-1=9,\qquad (5^2-5+1)^2=21^2=441,
]and (9\mid 441). So the answer is not only ((2,2)).
The full answer is
[
\boxed{(2,2)}
]and
[
\boxed{(m,n)=\left(k^2+1,(k+1)^2+1\right)}
]or the reverse pair, for every integer (k\ge 0). So the first few are
[
(1,2),(2,1),(2,2),(2,5),(5,2),(5,10),(10,5),\dots
]The clean Vieta-jumping structure is this. From the original condition, one can prove
[
mn-1\mid m^2+n^2-2m-2n+3.
]So write
[
m^2+n^2-2m-2n+3=k(mn-1).
]As a quadratic in (n),
[
n^2-(km+2)n+(m^2-2m+3+k)=0.
]If (n) is one root, let the other root be (n’). Then
[
n+n’=km+2,
][
nn’=m^2-2m+3+k.
]The key jump is that
[
(mn-1)(mn’-1)=(m^2-m+1)^2.
]So if ((m,n)) is a solution, then ((m,n’)) is also a solution. For (n>m\ge 2), this gives a smaller positive solution with
[
0<n’<m.
]Thus repeated jumping eventually reaches the base cases. The base cases are:
- if (m=1), then (n=2);
- if (m=n), then (m=n=2).
For non-diagonal solutions the jump eventually reaches ((1,2)), and in those cases (k=2). Then the recurrence becomes
[
n’=2m+2-n.
]Reversing the jump gives
[
a_{r+1}=2a_r+2-a_{r-1},
]starting from
[
a_0=1,\qquad a_1=2.
]This solves to
[
a_r=r^2+1.
]So the non-diagonal solutions are exactly consecutive terms:
[
(a_r,a_{r+1})=\left(r^2+1,(r+1)^2+1\right),
]plus their reverses.
So: your idea is definitely on the right track, but the constant error in the symmetric expression made the later contradiction false. The problem actually has an infinite family.
Then how to avoid wrong: test a little to make sure I am right, it should be
-
-
(Hurwitz) The equation has no solutions in positive integers if k > n.
Similar to the previous one.
Let be positive integers such that . Prove that
Example 2.39
(Kvant) Let p and q be integers greater than 1. Assume that and .Prove that or .
The main logic is to decrease the power.
suppose , we have , so actually we have and .
- ,
- , . Later on, we can find that , so we have .
Example 2.40
(Bulgaria) Let a, b and c be positive integers such that and . Prove that the sets {a, b} and {c, } coincide.
Because
So , which indicates that
only need to try several situations then done.
Example 2.42
(Romania TST 2012) Let be positive integers and let
be a multiple of . Prove that is not divisible by
.
Firstly, we can supposed that all of the , if there exist 1, then the final proof can start with ignoring them.
Suppose that and , so we have that .
Since , so , so , and so we have , thus .
Contradiction!
Example 2.43
(Schinzel) Prove that there exists a constant with the following property: if a positive integer is even and not a multiple of 10, then the sum of the digits of is greater than for all .
The Idea of Partition: Quite impressive, that dividing the whole structure into different part so that every part have at least one number and sufficient to prove the lower bound.
Actually, I felt this really impress me, the combinatoric techniques and the constructing orders. I want to make more like this.
We will construct a geometric sequence that , so that (c which will be decided later). So , what we do next is to prove that the sum of number is n level and is k level.
Suppose and . What we ant to show is that
Because , so
If from to , all of is 0 and because , so we know that . Because we don’t want that happen, we let just let .
Then we know that sum of numbers is at least .
Example 2.49
Define a sequence by setting and for . Prove that divides for all n.
prove by induction that divides and that divides for all .
Example 2.50
(China 2004) Prove that every positive integer n, except a finite number of them, can be represented as a sum of 2004 positive integers: , where , and for all .
First is to think the induction on “2004”. But I simply think that just add M to 2M+1 is enough, but it can’t describe an even number. So I need something more. But If I just use 2M+2, it contradicts with .
Use to describe a number. Just a little deeper: If m>M, then 2m+1 is possible. If , then we know whether or , we get . So , thus proved. Just let .
2.2.2 Arithmetic of binomial coefficients
Example 2.51 (Gaussian binomial coefficient)
Let q be an integer greater than 1. If n,k are nonnegative integers, define the Gaussian binomial coefficient by for k > n and, if
where by convention the right-hand side equals 1 when k = 0. (We can see that the normal binomial is when q=1)
a) Prove that for all we have
b) Prove that is an integer for all n, k. Strong induction on n+k